Hahaha (This I prefer to LOL because, not only am I not a man of few words, I also am not a man of few letters. Also, as you may now notice, I thrive on irrelevant (but insightful) parenthetical toss-ins.) What now, you must be thinking? Well, my spell checker says "aint" is misspelled. What a hoot. Aint must, therefore, be somewhat legitimate. Pardon me, I should've typed ain't! My deceased high-school-English teacher must be shuddering in her grave. Although she didn't, I and, perhaps, the writers for "The Beverly Hillbillies" always thought aint was as legitimate a word as any other word. Consider "preponderance". Preponderance was probably invented by a lawyer who, later, became an award-winning writer of bills or regulations in some administrative component of government. I am, however, still confused why ain't needs an apostrophe because it (meaning ain't) aint really a contraction of anything. Although the spell checker thinks I should be typing "aunt" and doesn't suggest "ain't" as a correct spelling, the proof of legitimacy is in that the spell checker does not recognize "ain't" as being misspelled. I rest my case.
No comments:
Post a Comment